Difference between revisions of "PINES NC"
From ATTWiki
(→LIMTATION) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by one user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
http://www.pines-mfg.com/images/model1142.jpg | http://www.pines-mfg.com/images/model1142.jpg | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===STRENGTH=== | ||
| + | This type of bender is known to be an inexpensive solution compared to full CNC (3 or more controlled axes - Carriage Feed, Carriage Rotate, Bend Arm). These benders fit applications where there are few part shapes produced overall, or single bend applications. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===LIMITATION=== | ||
| + | For applications that require multiple bends with rotation (twist) between the bend planes, then this style of bender can severly limit production capabilities - potentially costing much more in the long-run than the more expensive CNC benders. | ||
--[[User:Mcone|Mcone]] 18:52, 29 January 2007 (EST) | --[[User:Mcone|Mcone]] 18:52, 29 January 2007 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:59, 4 February 2007
The PINES NC (numerical control) control is a BEND angle controller. It does not communicate with other computers and measuring centers.
http://www.pines-mfg.com/images/model1142.jpg
STRENGTH
This type of bender is known to be an inexpensive solution compared to full CNC (3 or more controlled axes - Carriage Feed, Carriage Rotate, Bend Arm). These benders fit applications where there are few part shapes produced overall, or single bend applications.
LIMITATION
For applications that require multiple bends with rotation (twist) between the bend planes, then this style of bender can severly limit production capabilities - potentially costing much more in the long-run than the more expensive CNC benders.
--Mcone 18:52, 29 January 2007 (EST)
